"If there are many of us." A deputy from Udmurtia called on residents to join his lawsuit against toll bridges.

Deputy from Kambarsky District Eduard Glukhov already several years is seeking abolition of tolls on bridges over rivers Kama и BuoyFor residents of the 12-strong Kambarki This is the only road to large settlements where the hospital, military registration and enlistment office, tax office, trauma center, maternity hospital and morgue are located.
Residents have to to pay 330 rublesto drive a passenger car across the bridge over the Kama: this is the only way they can get into Sarapul and the regional center - IzhevskThe return trip costs the same.
Driving across the bridge over the Bui, which leads to Neftekamskis worth 220 rubles.
In March, the Supreme Court of Udmurtia began consider A deputy's lawsuit against the regional government. At the very first meeting, officials announced that district residents had an alternative to the toll bridge: in the summer, they could reach larger towns by ferry, and in the winter, by ice crossing. There was also a rail link.
Government officials were unable to provide the formula used to calculate the cost of toll travel, citing commercial confidentiality.
At the same time, on March 26, the State Council of the Republic took a step towards and accepted the A law on travel compensation for residents of the Kambarsky District who travel to the hospital on a doctor's referral.
On this wave Eduard Glukhov She urged all concerned citizens to join his lawsuit against toll bridges.
«I don't have the right to defend all the residents of the Kambarsky District. Only the prosecutor has that right, but he refused to defend the interests of an unlimited number of people., — the deputy clarified and posted claim form. — If there are many of us, perhaps the prosecutor’s office will take our side.”
The fact that other residents also want to support Glukhov’s demands became known at the first hearing: the judge voiced Three people filed statements seeking to join the case. The Udmurt government objected to their participation, but the court disagreed with the officials.
Photo: Business Square